Legal Opinion

United States v. Michelson

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 5, 1948No. 130, Docket 20818PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK, Circuit Judge.

The Second Count.

We think that Congress, as it lawfully may, provided that to “offer” a bribe and to “give” a bribe are two distinct crimes even when parts of a single transaction, since the one (to “give”) involves an element which the other (to “offer”) does not. The test, as stated in Morgan v. Devine, 237 U.S. 632, 640, 35 S.Ct. 712, 714, 59 L.Ed. 1153, is whether “separate acts have been committed with the requisite criminal intent. * * * ” The present case does not meet that test. Kratter, the principal government witness, testified as follows: On July 17, 1946, in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Gavieres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Burton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  5. Albrecht v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. United States v. Harry BernsteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  3. United States v. Alex DandyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. Cyrus T. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
  5. United States v. Harold Gross, Also Known as Harry GrossCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API