Legal Opinion
Wärtsilä NSD North America, Inc. v. Hill International, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided October 29, 2004No. Civil Action 99-4565(SSB)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION REGARDING DEFENDANT HILL INTERNATIONAL’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BROTMAN, District Judge.
Defendant Hill International Incorporated (“Hill”) is a construction consulting firm in the business of providing expert advice and project management for major construction projects. Plaintiff Wártsilá NSD North America, Inc (“Wártsilá”) is an engineering and construction company. Presently before the Court is Hill’s motion seeking summary judgment as to the remaining claims in the Amended Complaint: negligence, fraud, and breach of contract. This litigation arises out of a business…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Gennari v. Weichert Co. RealtorsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Professional Cleaning & Innovative Building Services, Inc. v. Kennedy Funding, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- AMRAPUR, INC. v. JOHNSON CONTROLS SECURITY SOLUTIONS, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025
- Bruderman Asset Management, LLC v. Real Time Consultants, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2021
- CDK GLOBAL, LLC v. TULLEY AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- FULLERTON v. TINTON FALLSDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.