Legal Opinion

Adler v. Safeguard Insurance

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 27, 1934PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

These are actions of contract to recover premiums paid under certain Massachusetts standard fire insurance policies, the second against the agent who wrote the policies, and the first against the company which issued them.

The declarations are for the same cause of action. In the declaration in the case against Burnes the plaintiff alleges, in substance, that she was the holder of eight fire insurance policies covering certain premises in Boston, that the policies were cancelled, and that return premiums became payable to the plaintiff; that these return premiums were paid to the defendant who…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Davidson v. German Insurance Co. of FreeportSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1907
  2. Elder v. Federal InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  3. Clinton v. Norfolk Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  4. Parker v. Trustees of Smith CharitiesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Glens Falls Insurance v. Founders' InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. Williams v. SederMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  3. Gechijian v. Richmond InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  4. Crane Construction Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  5. Murphy v. NelsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API