Brown v. State

Ruffin, Chief Judge.

A jury found Isaac Brown guilty of robbery. Following the denial of his motion for new trial, he appeals, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence. Finding the evidence sufficient to support the verdict, we affirm.

When reviewing a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence in a criminal matter, we consider the evidence in a light favorable to the jury’s verdict and neither weigh the evidence nor evaluate witness credibility.1 We only “assess whether the evidence was sufficient to find [Brown] guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.”2

Viewed in this light, the evidence shows…