In the Interest of A. B.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Doyle, Judge.
Following his adjudication of delinquency for committing robbery,1 aggravated assault,2 and kidnapping,3 A. B. appeals, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence. For the reasons that follow, we affirm in part and reverse in part.
With respect to the sufficiency of the evidence supporting a juvenile court adjudication of delinquency,
we apply the same standard of review that is used in any criminal case by construing the evidence in favor of the adjudication to determine if a rational trier of fact could have found beyond a reasonable doubt that the juvenile committed the acts…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Garza v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
- Frazier v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
- Hester v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
- Rayshad v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- Kinney v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Horne v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- Grimes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- Kirt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- In the Interest of R. W.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Sellars v. EvansSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.