Legal Opinion

New Kensington City Lines, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 18, 1963No. Appeals, Nos. 2 and 4PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, P. J.,

These appeals by two protestants are from the final order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, *492dated June 11, 1962,1 granting W. L. Roenigk the limited right to render group and party service by motor vehicle from the Township of Harrison, Allegheny County, to points in Pennsylvania. W. L. Roenigk filed his application on May 9, 1961, seeking a certificate covering group and party service from the Townships of Harrison and Fawn and the Borough of Brackenridge, Allegheny County, to points in Pennsylvania. Protests were filed by the two present appellants, New…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. D. F. Bast, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. H. J. Gongaware & Sons v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Reeder v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Highway Express Lines, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. Leaman Transportation Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Purolator Courier Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Jones Motor Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Merz White Way Tours v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API