Legal Opinion

Central Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. Ingram

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1984Published

1Opinion of the Court

678 S.W.2d 28 (1984)

CENTRAL ADJUSTMENT BUREAU, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Henry Preston INGRAM, Richard B. Goostree, James C. Bjorkholm, Jr., and Ingram & Associates, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Nashville.

September 17, 1984.

Frank C. Gorrell, Jay S. Bowen, Judith A. Powell, Nashville, for plaintiff-appellant.

Fred D. Thompson, Ronald W. Routson, Nashville, for defendants-appellees.

OPINION

DROWOTA, Justice.

This appeal under Rule 11, Tenn.R. App.P., involves non-competition clauses in employment contracts. It raises an issue regarding the consideration necessary to…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Bob Pearsall Motors, Inc. v. Regal Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Raimonde v. Van VlerahOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Kadis v. . BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  4. Karpinski v. IngrasciNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Sherman v. PfefferkornMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API