Central Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. Ingram
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
678 S.W.2d 28 (1984)
CENTRAL ADJUSTMENT BUREAU, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Henry Preston INGRAM, Richard B. Goostree, James C. Bjorkholm, Jr., and Ingram & Associates, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Nashville.
September 17, 1984.
Frank C. Gorrell, Jay S. Bowen, Judith A. Powell, Nashville, for plaintiff-appellant.
Fred D. Thompson, Ronald W. Routson, Nashville, for defendants-appellees.
OPINION
DROWOTA, Justice.
This appeal under Rule 11, Tenn.R. App.P., involves non-competition clauses in employment contracts. It raises an issue regarding the consideration necessary to…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Bob Pearsall Motors, Inc. v. Regal Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1975
- Raimonde v. Van VlerahOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Kadis v. . BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Karpinski v. IngrasciNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Sherman v. PfefferkornMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.