Legal Opinion

Ballard v. King

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1983No. C-1787PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGEE, Justice.

Petitioners, Tommy Ballard and the Bank of Woodson, instituted this suit against respondents, Bill King, Cecil King and Zana Anderson. Ballard sought damages for fraudulent representations made by respondents in connection with the sale of stock in the Bank of Woodson. The Bank sought damages from respondents for breach of their fiduciary duties. The trial court, sitting without a jury, rendered judgment that Ballard recover $122,500 from Bill King, $62,074.56 from Anderson, and $43,-425.62 from Cecil King. The trial court further rendered judgment that the Bank recover $20,000…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Seymour v. GillespieTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  2. King v. BallardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hauglum v. Durst, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1989
  2. Johnson v. J. Hiram Moore, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  3. Jaramillo v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1985
  4. Federal Deposit Insurance v. BensonDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1994
  5. Resolution Trust Corp. v. NorrisDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API