Legal Opinion
Thomas v. Hempt Bros.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 24, 1952No. Appeal, No. 66PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Jones,
The plaintiff, an employee of the defendant partnership, filed his complaint in the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County seeking to recover from his employer overtime wages for a specified period, liquidated damages and counsel fees under the provisions of Secs. 6, 7 and 16 (b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 as amended.1
*385After preliminary objections to the original complaint and also to the first amended complaint had been sustained (see 62 D. & C. 618, 626, and 74 D. & C. 213, 218), a second amended complaint was filed. Preliminary objections to that…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- McLeod v. ThrelkeldSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Overstreet v. North Shore Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Roland Electrical Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Emil v. HanleySupreme Court of the United States · 1943
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. ColemanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Alstate Construction Co. v. DurkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Thomas v. Hempt BrothersSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Carver v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
- Natoli AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.