Neenan v. White
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Atchison District Court. Action by Neenan and others against White; same plaintiff against Black. Both actions, which were brought to recover land, were tried together, at the June term, 1889, and defendants having judgment, the plaintiffs bring the cases here. The opinion states the facts.
Read the full summary
Error from Atchison District Court. Action by Neenan and others against White; same plaintiff against Black. Both actions, which were brought to recover land, were tried together, at the June term, 1889, and defendants having judgment, the plaintiffs bring the cases here. The opinion states the facts. The deed of 1873 is void on its face, because it does not show an assignment of the tax-sale certificate from Samuel Gard, the holder and owner thereof, to P. L. Hubbard, the party to whom the deed was issued, and should not have been admitted in evidence over the objection of plaintiffs in…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
These cases were tried together, and the facts in each are substantially the same. The plaintiffs below (plaintiffs in error) were the heirs at law of Michael Neenan. Martin Walter was the original patentee from the United States of the northeast quarter of section 6, township 5, range 19, in Atchison county. On the 25th day of September, 1858, he deeded it to Michael Neenan. The latter lived at St. Joseph, Mo., until his death, on the 29th of March, 1885, with the exception of one year of residence in Colorado. St. Joseph is about 22…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Sanger v. RiceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rynearson v. ConnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
- Baughman v. HarveySupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
- Cross v. HermanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
- Robert v. GibsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
- Gibson v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.