Legal Opinion

Payton v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Delaware corporation

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided August 25, 2025No. 1:24-cv-00153Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION Ernest Payton, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) No. 24 C 153 v. ) ) Judge Jorge L. Alonso Union Pacific Railroad Company, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiffs contend that Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company collected their fingerprints in violation of the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (“BIPA”). Union Pacific moves for summary judgment on the basis that it is exempt from BIPA claims. For the reasons stated below, the motion is denied. Legal Standard Summary judgment is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Spurling v. C & M Fine Pack, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  3. Allstate Insurance Company, as Subrogee of Sam Lakhia v. Menards, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  4. Aleia Tousis v. Keith BilliotCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2023
  5. In re HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API