Legal Opinion

W. F. Corbin & Co. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 13, 1910No. 2,018PublishedCited by 16 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Ohio. Proceeding by the United States against Nine Barrels of Whisky, W. E. Corbin & Co., claimants. Judgment for plaintiff, and claimants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

McCALL, District Judge.

This is a proceeding in error to reverse a judgment of forfeiture entered in the District Court of the United States for the Western Division of the Southern District of Ohio.

The information filed on behalf of the United States contains two counts.

The first is under Rev. St. § 3455 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 2279), and the second under Rev. St. § 3326 (p. 2169).

The court directed a verdict of not guilty as to the second count, and submitted to the jury the question of guilt as to the first count, which resulted in a verdict for the government. Upon this verdict the lower…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Kirby v. TallmadgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Clifton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1846
  3. Union Pacific Coal Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  4. Manning v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  5. Davis v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1897

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Marrone v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Northern Railway Co. v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Isbell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
  4. Childress v. NordmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. Maryland Cas. Co. v. Independent Metal Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API