Legal Opinion

State v. Franklin

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 2014No. 87253-8PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGordon McCloud, J.

¶1 The trial court excluded defendant Andre Franklin’s proffered evidence that someone else committed the cyberstalking-related crimes with which he was charged. Specifically, it excluded evidence that Franklin’s live-in girlfriend Rasheena Hibbler had sent threatening e-mails to his other girlfriend Nanette Fuerte despite the fact that Hibbler had the motive (jealousy), the means (access to the computer and e-mail accounts at issue), and the prior history (of sending earlier threatening e-mails to Fuerte regarding her relationship with Franklin) to support Franklin’s theory of the case.

¶2…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Holmes v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. State v. GuloyWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  4. People v. McCaughanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  5. State v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 2010

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. State v. WadeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  2. State Of Washington, Resp-cross v. Danny Giles, App-crossCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  3. State Of Washington v. Geraldo Castro Dejesus IiiCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  4. State Of Washington v. Alan D. JenksCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  5. State Of Washington v. Santiago Ortuno-perezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API