State v. Franklin
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGordon McCloud, J.
¶1 The trial court excluded defendant Andre Franklin’s proffered evidence that someone else committed the cyberstalking-related crimes with which he was charged. Specifically, it excluded evidence that Franklin’s live-in girlfriend Rasheena Hibbler had sent threatening e-mails to his other girlfriend Nanette Fuerte despite the fact that Hibbler had the motive (jealousy), the means (access to the computer and e-mail accounts at issue), and the prior history (of sending earlier threatening e-mails to Fuerte regarding her relationship with Franklin) to support Franklin’s theory of the case.
¶2…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Holmes v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- State v. GuloyWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- People v. McCaughanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- State v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 2010
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- State v. WadeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- State Of Washington, Resp-cross v. Danny Giles, App-crossCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- State Of Washington v. Geraldo Castro Dejesus IiiCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- State Of Washington v. Alan D. JenksCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- State Of Washington v. Santiago Ortuno-perezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.