State Of Washington v. Santiago Ortuno-perez
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtDwyer, J.
¶1 Following a jury trial, Santiago Ortuno-Perez was convicted of murder in the second degree, committed while armed with a firearm. Ortuno-Perez’s planned defense was that another person who was armed at the scene—Austin Agnish—committed the charged offense. Prior to trial, Ortuno-Perez sought permission from the trial court to identify Agnish to the jury as the killer, to cross-examine the State’s witnesses for bias in their testimony, and to introduce additional evidence indicating that a person other than Ortuno-Perez committed the murder. The trial court excluded the evidence and later…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State Of Washington v. Alan D. JenksCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- State Of Washington v. Christian Archaga-reyesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- State Of Washington v. Scott HalfhillCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018