Legal Opinion

Tuck v. Gudnason

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 20, 1938No. Civ. No. 10652PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Plaintiff sought damages for alleged breach of contract. Upon the first trial, a judgment of nonsuit was entered in favor of defendant. Said judgment was reversed on appeal. (Tuck v. Gudnason, 11 Cal. App. (2d) 626 [54 Pac. (2d) 88].) Thereafter, a second trial was had before the court sitting without a jury. The trial court made findings in favor of defendant and judgment was entered accordingly. Plaintiff appeals from said judgment.

The pleadings and the evidence most favorable to plaintiff are sufficiently set forth in the opinion on the former appeal. (Tuck v. Gudnason, supra.) Upon the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Herbert v. LankershimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Tuck v. GudnasonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Hartford v. Pacific Motor Trucking Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Lasher v. FawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Vila v. BrovelliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lake v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API