Simmons v. Quick
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARDSON, Chief Judge.
Appellee, who succeeded appellant as tenant of premises used as a rooming house, sued the latter for reimbursement of a water rent which accrued during the prior tenancy. Payment had been made by appel-lee after the municipal authorities threatened immediate suspension of water service.
No express contractual obligation was claimed. No privity of title or contractual relationship was shown to have existed between the parties, nor was the owner of the premises made a party. The theory of the suit was that appellant owed the bill which appellee was forced to pay or be…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Metropolitan Railroad v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Board of Highway Commissioners v. City of BloomingtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
- George's Radio, Inc. v. Capital Transit Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- First Nat. Bank of Okmulgee v. MatlockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Bailis v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Farrell v. WardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
- Gray v. DrozeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
- Price v. QuillDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946