Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Gibson

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 2007No. 05-216PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cotter

¶1 Jeff Gibson, Melinda Gibson, Amber Gibson, Zachery Gibson, and Edward Kinion (the Gibsons) sought to recover from State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) medical payments coverage (MPC) from three policies they had with State Farm. State Farm brought an action in the Eighth Judicial District Court, Cascade County, seeking a declaratory judgment regarding the scope of the MPC under the three auto insurance policies. The District Court granted State Farm’s motion for summary judgment on the grounds that Gibsons could not stack the MPC. We reverse and remand.

¶2 The issue…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hardy v. Progressive Specialty Insurance Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Swanson v. Hartford Ins. Co. of MidwestMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Bennett v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Augustine v. SimonsonMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Gray v. Simonson Farmers Ins. ExcMontana Supreme Court · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Montana Petroleum Tank Release Compensation Board v. Crumleys, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Newbury v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Ins. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Town of Geraldine v. Montana Municipal Insurance AuthorityMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Dick Anderson Construction, Inc. v. Monroe Construction Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Estate of Gleason v. Central United Life InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2015

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API