Legal Opinion

Isser v. Berg

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1963PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph A. Suozzi, J.

Although unopposed, this motion by attorneys for an uninsured defendant in a personal injury action, to withdraw as his counsel, on the eve of trial, is denied. Movant simply states that his bill was only partially paid and that his client failed to follow directions. More factual detail is required before the court will permit counsel to withdraw. There must be a showing of good cause and reasonable notice before an attorney will be permitted to terminate his relationship with a client (Grittano v. Flannery, 21 Misc 2d 91; Mambrino v. State of New York, 30 Misc 2d 990).

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mambrino v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1961
  2. Grittano v. FlanneryNew York Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Central Cab Co. v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  2. Weynberg v. City of New York Commission on Human RightsNew York Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Goldstein v. Albert (In Re Albert)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  4. Cashdan v. CashdanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. George v. GeorgeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API