Legal Opinion
Goldstein v. Albert (In Re Albert)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 21, 2002No. 19-22587PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING GOODMAN & SA-PERSTEIN’S MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL
CECELIA G. MORRIS, Bankruptcy Judge.
Counsel for Adversary Proceeding Plaintiffs filed a motion to be relieved as counsel to the Plaintiffs. This Court holds that counsel may not withdraw.
Upon the Notice of Motion and Application dated January 14, 2002, by the Law Offices of Goodman & Saperstein for permission to withdraw as counsel to the Plaintiffs, and the Amended Notice of Motion and Amended Application dated February 25, 2002, and this matter having been properly noticed, and having come on to be…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Michael F. Armstrong v. Clovis McAlpinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Jacobson v. SassowerNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Shaw v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Robert and Beverly Ohntrup v. Firearms Center, Inc. v. Makina Ve Kimya Endustrisi Kurumu Morgan, Lewis & BockiusCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- McAlpin v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Stair v. CalhounDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- United States of America, and U.S. District Court Western District of New York v. Darnyl ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Danvers Savings Bank v. Cuddy (In Re Cuddy)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
- United States v. SteinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- DOE v. Syracuse UniversityDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2021
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.