Legal Opinion

Porter v. Talcott

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1823PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Assumpsit, to recover $6500, being the difference on ex- , _ T .• change of vessels, tried before his honour, thelf.te Mr. Justice Platt, at the New- iork sittings, on the 2d of May, 1821. The declaration was, that the defendants, at the several times thereinafter mentioned, being traders and joint dealers, under the name, firm and style of Talcott &■ Bozo ers, at New Or-j ' leans, in the state of Louisiana, to wit, at the city of .New- York, and in the county of New-York;…

Read the full summary

Assumpsit, to recover $6500, being the difference on ex- , _ T .• change of vessels, tried before his honour, thelf.te Mr. Justice Platt, at the New- iork sittings, on the 2d of May, 1821. The declaration was, that the defendants, at the several times thereinafter mentioned, being traders and joint dealers, under the name, firm and style of Talcott &■ Bozo ers, at New Or-j ' leans, in the state of Louisiana, to wit, at the city of .New- York, and in the county of New-York; and the plaintiffs, at the said several times, being traders and joint dealers, under the name, firm and style of William…

1Opinion of the CourtWo on woe th, J.

This was an action of assumpsit, to recover the sum of $6500, being the difference on exchange X)f vessels.

The plaintiffs declare, first, on a special agreement-whereby they exchange the brig Emma for the ship Vigilanti averring that the defendants promised to pay the plaintiffs $6500 to boot. The declaration, also, contains counts for goods sold, and the money counts.

It is contended, on behalf of the defendants, first, that the action for goods sold and delivered does not lie, the con-' tract being a special one ; and secondly, that the contract proved, varies from that laid in .the special…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tobey v. BarberNew York Supreme Court · 1809
  2. Felton v. DickinsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1813
  3. Johnson v. WeedNew York Supreme Court · 1812
  4. Markle v. HatfieldNew York Supreme Court · 1807
  5. Whitbeck v. Van NessNew York Supreme Court · 1814

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Merchants National Bank v. GoodWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Matteson v. EllsworthWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Turner v. Bank of Fox LakeNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  4. Hoefliger v. WellsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Board of Education v. . FondaNew York Court of Appeals · 1879

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API