Ringsred v. City of Duluth
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KYLE, District Judge.
Before the Court are Plaintiffs’ Objections to the October 22, 2001 Report and Recommendation (R&R) of Magistrate Judge Raymond L. Erickson.
This Court has conducted the required de novo review of the objected to portions of the R&R and is satisfied that Judge Erickson’s recommended disposition is fully supported by the record before him and by controlling legal precedent. The R&R is thorough and the legal analysis sound.
Upon all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS ORDERED:
1. The Objections (Doc. No. 121) are OVERRULED;
2. The Report and Recommendation…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Robert Boback v. Michael S. Geisler, Esq., et alDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2025