Legal Opinion

United States v. Barrios

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 29, 1952PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUGARMAN, District Judge.

The defendants were indicted for conspiring (1) “to commit offenses against the United States, to wit: to violate Title 31, §§ 440, 441, 442 and 443 of the United States Code, and the regulations (commonly known as the “Gold Regulations”)- issued and promulgated thereunder, and to defraud the United States in the exercise of its governmental functions of regulating the value of money * * * ”, and (2) to acquire excess quantities of gold and to divert and dispose of the same without an appropriate license.

The defendants move to dismiss the indictment contending that it…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. CohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Matthews v. CorreaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  3. United States v. HuttoSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. United States v. 71.41 Ounces Gold Filled ScrapCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
  5. United States v. O'TooleDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Thomas Henry Hunsaker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  2. United States v. LaneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API