Kleebauer v. Western Fuse & Explosives Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.
This is an action for damages. It is alleged in the complaint that defendant was at the time, and prior to the nineteenth day of July, 1898, engaged in manufacturing and storing powder, dynamite, nitroglycerine, and other high explosives and fuses on its premises near Melrose, in Alameda County, and that, by reason of the negligence and carelessness of the defendant, a large quantity of fuse and explosives belonging to it, and under its control, on said day exploded with great violence, whereby plaintiffs’ house was injured and damaged to the extent of four hundred dollars, for which amount…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Judson v. Giant Powder Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
- Heeg v. . LichtNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Schmeer v. . Gas Light Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Kinney v. Koopman & GerdesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
- People v. SandsNew York Supreme Court · 1806
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Clark v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours Powder Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1915
- Rathbun v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Flynn v. ButlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- McGhee v. Norfolk & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Rocca v. Tuolumne County Electric Power & Light Co.California Court of Appeal · 1926
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.