Legal Opinion

Advance Tank & Construction Co. v. City of DeSoto

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided May 23, 1990No. Civ. A. 3-89-1542-HPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SANDERS, Chief Judge.

Before the Court are Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, filed April 20, 1990, and Defendant’s response, filed May 10, 1990. Plaintiff moves for a judgment that the liquidated damages provision in the contract between the parties providing for $500 per day of delay is an unenforceable penalty clause.

Under Texas law, a liquidated damages provision will be enforced when the court finds that (1) the harm caused by the breach is incapable or difficult of estimation, and (2) the amount of liquidated damages is a reasonable forecast of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stewart v. BaseyTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Rio Grande Valley Sugar Growers, Inc. v. CampesiTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Ryan v. ThurmondCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  4. Elliott v. HenckCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  5. Commercial Union Insurance Co. v. La Villa Independent School District, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. BANK ONE, TX, NA v. Prudential Ins. Co. of Amer.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1995
  2. Baker v. International Record Syndicate, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1991
  3. PYCA Industries, Inc. v. Harrison County Waste Water Management DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  4. In Re Independent American Real Estate, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1992
  5. Bank One v. Prudential InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API