Legal Opinion

Hollis v. Muller (In re T & M Enterprises, Inc.)

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided September 17, 2002No. Bankruptcy No. 97 B 11823; Adversary No. 00 A 00869PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

RONALD BARLIANT, Bankruptcy Judge.

The Trustee of the T & M Enterprises, Inc., bankruptcy estate moved for summary judgment on the cross claim asserted by Raymond and Lillian Perham, the sellers of T & M. The Trustee contends that she has rightfully retained as property of the bankruptcy estate $73,500 paid under an installment note made and delivered by the buyers of T & M, and that the sellers are barred by the doctrines of waiver, estoppel, and laches from attempting to recover those funds.

The buyers, David P. Muller and Piotr L. Wisniewski, also moved for summary judgment…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Hot Wax, Inc. v. Turtle Wax, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  4. Tatum C. Singletary v. Continental Illinois National Bank and Trust Company of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  5. Teamsters & Employers Welfare Trust of Illinois v. Gorman Brothers Ready MixCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re DiniUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API