Legal Opinion

Frankel v. . Wolper

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 19, 1920PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal, by permission, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered February 18, 1918, unnaimously affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term without a jury in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff by reason of improper professional treatment by defendant, a physician and surgeon.

Read the full summary

Appeal, by permission, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered February 18, 1918, unnaimously affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term without a jury in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff by reason of improper professional treatment by defendant, a physician and surgeon. The trial court held that the action was for malpractice and dismissed the complaint on the ground that the two-year Statute of…

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Hogan, Caedozo, McLaughlin, Ceane and Elkus, JJ.

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Milau Associates, Inc. v. North Avenue Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Sullivan v. O'CONNORMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  3. Golia v. Health Insurance PlanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
  4. Board of Education of Central School District No. 1 v. Mancuso Bros.New York Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Hirsch v. SafianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API