Poindexter v. Hicks
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtHodges, J.
The defendants in error, A. Hicks and Howard Hicks, sued the plaintiff in error, Poindexter, to recover a balance due upon a rental contract for the occupancy of a building in Tyler, Tex., and to foreclose a landlord’s lien on certain personal property- described in the petition. After a trial before the court without a jury the findings of fact and conclusions of law were filed, of which the following is the substance:
A. Hicks and Howard Hicks were the owners of a two-story business house situated in Tyler, the ground floor of which consisted of a storeroom 40 feet wide and 70 feet long.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sorrells v. GoldbergCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904
- Edens v. CleavesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
- Reeves v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
3Cited by5 opinions
- American General Ins. Co. v. NanceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Dennis v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Williams v. SaundersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
- First State Bank of Denton v. Vestal & NaugleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Peck & Hickernell v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926