Legal Opinion

First State Bank of Denton v. Vestal & Naugle

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 9, 1932No. 12588PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDunklin, J.

F. H. Vestal and I. T. Naugle, composing the partnership firm of Vestal & Naugle, were engaged as contractors in the construction of residences and other buildings in the town of Denton, and as such contractors they built a residence for C. N. Adkisson. The contract to do the work was in the name of I. T. Naugle only, but for the benefit of the partnership firm. As a consideration for the work to be performed Adkisson and wife executed their promissory note, payable to Naugle, in the sum of $3,500, and also a mechanic’s lien on the lot and improvements to secure the payment of the note. Those…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Manhattan Bank of Memphis v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Shaw v. Centerfield Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  3. Poindexter v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. Ray v. CartwrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City Nat. Bank of Bryan v. GustavusCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  2. Titus v. Gulf Liquid Fertilizer Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  3. Shaw v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API