Legal Opinion

Standard Stock Food Co. v. Wright

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 10, 1912No. 222PublishedCited by 88 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA. The facts, which involve the construction and constitutionality of the provisions in the statutes of Iowa relative to sale of feed for stock, are stated in the opinion. The tax imposed is a license fee and therefore void as a violation of the commerce clause of the Federal Constitution.

Read the full summary

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA. The facts, which involve the construction and constitutionality of the provisions in the statutes of Iowa relative to sale of feed for stock, are stated in the opinion. The tax imposed is a license fee and therefore void as a violation of the commerce clause of the Federal Constitution. Brown v. Maryland, 12 Wheat. 419; Robbins v. Shelby County, 120 U. S. 489; American Fertilizer Co. v. Board of Agriculture, 43 Fed.-Rep. 609; Lee Co. v. Webster, Í90 Fed. Rep. 353. To require a manufacturer or one importing…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hughes

The Standard Stock Food Company, a Nebraska corporation, brought this suit against the State Food and Dairy Commissioner of Iowa to restrain the enforcement of a statute of Iowa effective July 4, 1907 (Code of Iowa, Supplement 1907, §§ 5077-a6-5077-a24), relating' to the sale within the State of “concentrated commercial feeding stuffs,” upon the ground that it was repugnant to the interstate commerce clause (§ 8, Art. I), and to the Fourteenth Amendment, of the Constitution of the United States. Demurrer to the bill was sustained by the Circuit Court and the complainant appeals.

It was alleged…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. New York Ex Rel. Hatch v. ReardonSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Plumley v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Hennington v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. HaberSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  5. Tyler v. Judges of the Court of RegistrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1900

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. Rast v. Van Deman & Lewis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Tileston v. UllmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Jones v. OpelikaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Plymouth Coal Co. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. Middleton v. Texas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API