Legal Opinion

Philadelphia Fraternal Order of Correctional Officers v. Rendell

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 23, 1999PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

CASTILLE, Justice.

Appellants challenge the constitutionality of a City of Philadelphia ordinance which authorizes the City to recognize only intervenor AFSCME District Council 33 as the exclusive collective bargaining representative for the City’s correctional officers. This Court granted review to determine if the municipal ordinance violates appellants’ rights either to free speech and association or equal protection under the Pennsylvania Constitution, and if appellants’ claims against appellees, the Mayor and the City of Philadelphia, are barred by the doctrine of res…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Babbitt v. United Farm Workers National UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Smith v. Arkansas State Highway Employees, Local 1315Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Love v. Borough of StroudsburgSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Philadelphia Correctional Officers Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. AFSCME District Council 47, Local 2187 v. The City of Philadelphia & AFSCME District Council 33Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  2. Oberholzer, F., et ux v. Galapo, S. Aplts.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API