Legal Opinion

Hafner v. Montana Department of Labor & Industry

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1996No. 96-105PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart

Appellant, Gregg Hafner (Hafner), appeals from the decision of the Thirteenth Judicial District Court, Yellowstone County, affirming a Board of Labor Appeals’ denial of unemployment insurance benefits. We affirm the District Court.

We restate the issue raised by Hafiier as follows:

Did Hafner’s failure to notify his employer of a conflict of interest constitute misconduct for purposes of unemployment compensation benefits?

BACKGROUND

This case arises out of the Department of Labor’s (the Department) denial of unemployment benefits to Hafner. Hafner appeals from the District Court’s decision…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wadsworth v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Hafner v. Conoco, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Connolly v. Montana Board of Labor AppealsMontana Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Stine v. Western Federal Savings BankMontana Supreme Court · 1994

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gary & Leo's Fresh Foods, Inc. v. State, Department of Labor & IndustryMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Somont Oil Co. v. KingMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  3. McKay v. Board of Labor AppealsMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Montana Department of Corrections v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Moody v. Northland Royalty Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API