Legal Opinion
Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. v. Drexel Chemical Co.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 24, 2009No. Civil Action 08-1627(JDB)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN D. BATES, District Judge.
Plaintiff Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. (“Syngenta”) and defendant Drexel Chemical Company (“Drexel”) are currently engaged in a binding arbitration proceeding initiated under the data-sharing provisions of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (“FIFRA”), 7 U.S.C. §§ 136 et seq. Syngenta seeks a declaratory judgment that the arbitration panel cannot consider a 1993 Agreement and Stipulation in evaluating Syngenta’s data compensation award. Now before the Court is Drexel’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Abadi v. National Railroad Passenger CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
- American Chemistry Council, Inc. v. National Academy of SciencesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
- Arunachalam v. HarrisDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
- Dantzler v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
- Environment International Ltd v. Chemonics International IncDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.