Legal Opinion

Harlan Claire Stientjes Family Trust v. Thurston County

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 12, 2009No. 63865-3-IPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dwyer, A.C.J.

¶1 Pursuant to the Land Use Petition Act (LUPA), chapter 36.70C RCW, a court may review a *618local government’s land use decision only if the decision is final. A land use decision is final when it leaves nothing open to further dispute and sets to rest the cause of action between the parties. In this case, the Thurston County Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) remanded an administrative challenge to a construction site plan to its hearing examiner for further proceedings. The superior court reversed this decision. However, the BOCC’s decision was not a final decision because it…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Wenatchee Sportsmen Ass'n v. Chelan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. South Hollywood Hills Citizens Ass'n v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Watch v. Skagit CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Chelan County v. NykreimWashington Supreme Court · 2002

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wanthida Chandrruangphen, App V. City Of Sammamish, RespCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2024
  2. End The Prison Industrial Complex v. City Of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API