Legal Opinion

Mamalis v. Bornovas

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided November 30, 1972No. 6404Published

1Opinion of the Court

112 N.H. 423 (1972)

THEODOSIOS MAMALIS, ADMINISTRATOR OF ESTATE OF LOUIS D. BORNOVAS, & a.

v.

JULIE BORNOVAS.

No. 6404.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire.

November 30, 1972.

James A. Connor, by brief and orally, for the plaintiff.

Broderick, Craig & Costakis (Mr. Arthur J. Costakis orally) for the defendant.

KENISON, C.J.

The primary issue presented by this case is whether a divorce decree incorporating a stipulation equally dividing the equity in a homestead between husband and wife severed their mutual rights of survivorship and thus transformed their joint tenancy into a tenancy in common. A secondary…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. McDonald v. MorleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Douglas v. DouglasSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1968
  3. Duncan v. SuhyIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Witzel v. WitzelWyoming Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Burns v. NoletteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1929

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API