Filhiol v. Maurice
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS. This was an action of ejectment brought by Hippolite Filhiol and others, in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Arkansas, against Charles E. Maurice, Charles G. Convers and William G. Maurice, for the recovery of a parcel of land in the city of Hot Springs, Garland County, Arkansas, on the permanent reservation at Hot Springs, described as Bath house site No.…
Read the full summary
ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS. This was an action of ejectment brought by Hippolite Filhiol and others, in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Arkansas, against Charles E. Maurice, Charles G. Convers and William G. Maurice, for the recovery of a parcel of land in the city of Hot Springs, Garland County, Arkansas, on the permanent reservation at Hot Springs, described as Bath house site No. 8, and for rent-thereof as damages. Plaintiffs deraigned title as heirs at law of .Don J uan Filhiol, to whom it was…
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Fuller
Writs of error may be sued out directly frpm this court to the Circuit Courts in cases in which the construction or application of the Constitution of the United States is involved ; or in which the validity or construction of any treaty made under the authority.of the United States is drawn in question. Act of March 3, 1891, c. 517, § 5, 26 Stat. 826.
And we repeat, as has often been said before, that a case may be said to involve the construction or application of the Constitution of the United States when a title, right, privilege or immunity is claimed under that instrument, but a definite…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Arkansas v. Kansas & Texas Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- American Sugar Refining Co. v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Huguley Manufacturing Co. v. Galeton Cotton MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Muse v. Arlington Hotel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
3Cited by15 opinions
- Oneida Indian Nation v. County of OneidaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Amy Weber v. Frances McGroganCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- Joy v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Khedivial Line, S.A.E. v. Seafarers' International Union, International Longshoremen's AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Harris v. RosenbergerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.