Muse v. Arlington Hotel Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE OXROUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS.- Motion to dismiss or 'affirm. Margaret A. Muse and others filed their original complaint in ejectment against the Arlington; Hotel Company, July 25, 1894, in the Circuit Court .of the United States for the Eastern District of Arkansas,'to which defendant demurred.
Read the full summary
ERROR TO THE OXROUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS.- Motion to dismiss or 'affirm. Margaret A. Muse and others filed their original complaint in ejectment against the Arlington; Hotel Company, July 25, 1894, in the Circuit Court .of the United States for the Eastern District of Arkansas,'to which defendant demurred. Pending the demurrer, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint, in which they averred that defendant ivas “ a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Arkansas and .doing business at the city of Hot Springs in that State ”; and that…
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Fullee
"Writs of error may be sued out directly from this court to the Circuit Courts in cases, among others, in which the construction or application of the Constitution of the United States is involved; or in which the validity or construction of any treaty made under the authority of the United States. is drawn in question. Act of March 3, 1891, c. 517, § 5, 26 Stat. 826. If this case does not fall within one or both of these classes, 'this writ of error cannot be maintained.
As ruled in Ansbro v. United States, 159 U. S. 695, 697, “ a case may be said to involve the construction or Application of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- New Orleans v. BenjaminSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Oxley Stave Co. v. Butler CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Hanford v. DaviesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Colorado Central Consolidated Mining Co. v. TurckSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Joy v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Spencer v. Duplan Silk Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Hidalgo County Water Control and Improvement District No. 7 v. Wyatt C. HedrickCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Armstrong v. Alliance Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.