Legal Opinion

Patch v. Cashman

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 3, 1923PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.

The judge before whom the case was tried without a jury determined that through the fraud practised by the defendants, a firm of brokers, the plaintiff had been misled in the purchase of certain stocks as specified in the record, and he assessed damages and ordered judgment accordingly. The finding, if warranted, is conclusive. American Malting Co. v. Souther Brewing Co. 194 Mass. 89. The plaintiff upon discovery of the misrepresentations could affirm the sale, retain the stocks, and without a tender recover damages, in an action of tort for the •difference in value at the time when she…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Dustan v. . McAndrewNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  2. Morse v. WoodworthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  3. Noyes v. NoyesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  4. Whiting v. PriceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  5. American Malting Co. v. Souther Brewing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McNulty v. WhitneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  2. Dubois v. Atlantic Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  3. Newell v. RosenbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  4. Birch v. Arnold & Sears, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  5. Krinsky v. WhitneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API