Komp v. Raymond
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, James; I. Raymond, as President of A. A. Vantine & Co., from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the offiep of the clerk of the county of New York oil the 28tli day of November, 1898, upon the verdict of a jury, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 28th day of November. 1898, denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial made upon the minutes.
1Opinion of the Court
McLaughlim, J.:
This action was brought to recover a balance alleged to be due the plaintiff for services performed for the defendant under a written contract. The answer, among other things, alleged an accord and satisfaction of the plaintiff’s claim. The principal question litigated upon the trial was whether there had been an accord and satisfaction, and this is the only question which we deem it necessary to consider upon this appeal. It appears that in December, 1890, the parties entered into a written contract by which the plaintiff agreed to render services in the empire of Japan for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fuller v. . KempNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Nassoiy v. . TomlinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Ryan v. . WardNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Preston v. GrantSupreme Court of Vermont · 1861
- Coon v. . KnapNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Alcorn v. ArthurCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
- Genung v. Village of WaverlyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- Grockie v. HirshfieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- Jersey Island Dredging Co. v. WhitneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Komp v. RaymondAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.