Legal Opinion

Jersey Island Dredging Co. v. Whitney

California Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1906No. S.F. No. 3127Published

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion

The plaintiff, under an agreement with the defendant therefor, did certain dredging work, at a rate per diem agreed upon between the parties, on the defendant's ranch in Sonoma County, at the head of San Pablo Bay, on account of which the defendant paid to it one thousand dollars about September 1, 1900, leaving a balance of $97.75 unpaid upon the amount then claimed to be due. September 17th the plaintiff presented a bill for $721.35 (including said unpaid amount of the former bill), which it claimed to be then due to it. The defendant objected to this bill on the ground of the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Fuller v. . KempNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Nassoiy v. . TomlinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Ryan v. . WardNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  4. Grumley v. WebbSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
  5. Tanner v. MerrillMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API