Legal Opinion · Concurrence

McSpadden v. Mahoney

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 15, 1964No. 40815Published

1ConcurrenceDavison, Justice

(concurring specially)-

The statutes governing appeal procedure are an essential part of the administration of justice, whereby there will be furnished to litigants a fair and just review of the order or judgment that determined their controversy. When a party is deprived of this review because of a strict and technical interpretation of some equivocal rule of appeal procedure, he feels (in my opinion *662rightly so) that his matter has not received its fair share of the administration of justice.

It has long been my opinion that ambiguous statutes providing the procedure to be followed in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Cleveland v. HambrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  2. Wanner v. WannerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  3. Auto Convoy Company v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  4. Mitchell v. Great Western Oil and Gas CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  5. Temple v. CollingsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API