Legal Opinion

County of Onondaga v. New York State Department of Correctional Services

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 5, 1984PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.

Petitioners commenced this proceeding seeking relief in the nature of mandamus to compel respondents to accept sentenced prisoners within a specified period of time. Respondents concede that CPL 430.20 (subd 1) imposes upon them a clear legal obligation to accept sentenced prisoners “forthwith” (Crespo v Hall, 56 NY2d 856), but urge that this mandate has not been violated in the present case. We agree that, on this record, which indicates only that the relevant delays in accepting prisoners…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Crespo v. HallNew York Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ayers v. CoughlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Albro v. County of Onondaga, NYDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1986
  3. Johnson v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. County of Monroe v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  5. County of Monroe v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API