Legal Opinion

Packer v. Di Misa

Suffolk County District Court

Decided July 6, 1971PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLawrence Newmark, J.

This motion to sever the respondent’s counterclaim is denied. The petitioners have taken the position that the respondent’s counterclaim is unrelated to the issue of whether the petitioners are entitled to immediate possession of their property. In Janks v. Central City Roofing Co. (271 App. Div. 545), the landlord served a notice on the tenant to vacate the premises because he was terminating the lease for nonpayment of rent. The tenant did not leave, and the landlord brought a summary proceeding.

The tenant counterclaimed for damages resulting from the landlord’s failure to comply with…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Great Park Corp. v. GoldbergerCivil Court of the City of New York · 1964
  2. 240 West 37th Street Co. v. LippmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  3. Harfried Realty Co. v. Spuyten Amusement Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1934
  4. Tankoos-Yarmon Hotels, Inc. v. SmithAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1968

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cosmopolitan Associates v. OrtegaCivil Court of the City of New York · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API