Samos v. 43 East Realty Corp.
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This case came before the Court for oral argument on November 6, 2002, pursuant to an order that had directed the parties to appear and to show cause why the issues raised in this appeal should not be summarily decided. After considering the arguments of counsel and the memoranda filed by the parties, we are of the opinion that cause has not been shown, and the matter will be decided.
The plaintiff landlords, Charles and Maureen Samos, appeal from a Superior Court judgment in favor of the defendant tenant, 43 East Realty Corporation (ERC). The case involves the interpretation and effect…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Rotelli v. CatanzaroSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
- W.P. Associates v. Forcier, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994
- MacEra v. CerraSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
- Egidio DiPardo & Sons, Inc. v. LauzonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1998
- Paradis v. Greater Providence Deposit Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by8 opinions
- Sturbridge Home Builders, Inc. v. Downing Seaport, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
- Direct Action for Rights & Equality v. GannonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003
- Siebe, Inc. v. Louis M. Gerson Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2009
- Cady v. IMC Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
- The Elena Carcieri Trust-1988 v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.