Legal Opinion

Croixdale, Inc. v. County of Washington

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 25, 2007No. A06-153Published

1Opinion of the Court

726 N.W.2d 483 (2007)

CROIXDALE, INC., Relator,

v.

COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, Respondent.

No. A06-153.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

January 25, 2007.

Paul B. Zisla, Peter A. Koller, Julia M. Dayton, Moss & Barnett, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for Relator.

Doug Johnson, Washington County Attorney, Richard Hodsdon, Asst. Washington County Attorney, Stillwater, MN, for Respondent.

Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.

OPINION

MEYER, Justice.

Relator Croixdale, Inc. (Croixdale) challenged respondent County of Washington's decision to remove Croixdale's real property tax exemption beginning with taxes…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Christian Business Men's Committee of Minneapolis, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  2. County of Hennepin v. Brotherhood of the Church of GethsemaneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  3. North Star Research Institute v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. Care Institute, Inc.-Roseville v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  5. Validity of Claim of Assembly Homes, Inc. v. Yellow Medicine CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API