Citibank, N.A. v. Hine
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Harsha, A.J.
{¶ 1} Appellants Katherine Hine and Karen Stanley filed a motion for stay pending appeal. Appellee Citibank, N.A. ("Citibank") filed a response to the motion asserting-among other arguments-that the challenged entries are not final appealable orders. After reviewing Citibank's response, we directed Ms. Hine and Ms. Stanley to file a memorandum addressing whether this Court has jurisdiction over this appeal or whether it should be dismissed for lack of a final appealable order. After reviewing the filings and relevant law we conclude that there is no final appealable order and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- General Accident Insurance v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Walters v. Enrichment Center of Wishing Well, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
- Foor v. Huntington National BankOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
- Dispatch Printing Co. v. Recovery Ltd. PartnershipOhio Court of Appeals · 2006
- Midwest Sportservice, Inc. v. AndreoliOhio Court of Appeals · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- DMS Constr. Ents., L.L.C. v. HomickOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Citibank, N.A. v. HineOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. GronbeckOhio Court of Appeals · 2024