Legal Opinion

Citibank, N.A. v. Hine

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 23, 2017No. 17CA3598PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harsha, A.J.

{¶ 1} Appellants Katherine Hine and Karen Stanley filed a motion for stay pending appeal. Appellee Citibank, N.A. ("Citibank") filed a response to the motion asserting-among other arguments-that the challenged entries are not final appealable orders. After reviewing Citibank's response, we directed Ms. Hine and Ms. Stanley to file a memorandum addressing whether this Court has jurisdiction over this appeal or whether it should be dismissed for lack of a final appealable order. After reviewing the filings and relevant law we conclude that there is no final appealable order and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. General Accident Insurance v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Walters v. Enrichment Center of Wishing Well, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Foor v. Huntington National BankOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Dispatch Printing Co. v. Recovery Ltd. PartnershipOhio Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Midwest Sportservice, Inc. v. AndreoliOhio Court of Appeals · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. DMS Constr. Ents., L.L.C. v. HomickOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  2. Citibank, N.A. v. HineOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. State v. GronbeckOhio Court of Appeals · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API