Legal Opinion
KUEHNE & NAGEL (AG & CO) v. Geosource, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided January 6, 1986No. C.A. H-83-5913PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CARL O. BUE, Jr., District Judge.
On September 13, 1985 the Court deferred defendant’s motion to dismiss, and granted plaintiff’s motion to amend complaint wherein plaintiff invoked admiralty jurisdiction. Thereafter, pursuant to the September 13 Order, defendant re-urged its motion to dismiss. After prudent consider ation, the memoranda of the parties, as well as the facts and circumstances surrounding this matter, the Court is of the opinion that defendant’s motion should be denied for the reasons discussed below.
Facts and Argument
Plaintiff, a German corporation, filed suit against…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Strawbridge v. CurtissSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
- Executive Jet Aviation, Inc. v. City of ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Foremost Insurance v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Steamship Co. v. TugmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Garland Wayne Kelly and Allen Eugene Kelly, Sr. v. J. C. Smith and Chicot Land Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kuehne & Nagel (AG & Co.) v. Geosource, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- River & Offshore Services Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1987
- Puerto Rico Maritime Shipping Authority v. Luallipam, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1986
- Atlantic Dry Dock Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1991
- Abbott Chemical, Inc. v. Molinos De Puerto Rico, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.