Legal Opinion

State v. Snell

Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)

Decided April 17, 1997No. 08-95-00379-CVPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BARAJAS, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a finding by the trial court that a proposed allocation plan in a class action did not violate the Unclaimed Property Provision, as found in the Texas Property Code. We reverse the judgment of the trial court.

I. SUMMARY OF THE EVIDENCE

Appellants appeal the decision of the trial court by ordinary appeal in 08-95-00379-CV, and by way of writ of error in 08-96-00065-CV. We have consolidated both appeals.

In November 1995, Appellants appealed to this Court from an order dated August 29, 1995, entitled “Order Approving Final Plan of Allocation,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Railroad Commission of Texas v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Exxon Corporation v. BrecheenTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Runnymede Corporation v. METROPLEX PLAZA INC.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  4. Harris v. Moore, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1987

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. All v. AllCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
  2. In Re Lease Oil Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  3. Highland Homes Ltd. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Paterson v. Western Union FinclCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  5. Metromedia Restaurant Services, Inc. v. Strayhorn, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API