Paterson v. Western Union Fincl
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
REAVLEY, Circuit Judge:
The district court approved the settlement of a class action that awarded certain payments to each class member. The State of Texas (the State) intervened to contest the settlement provision that allowed Defendant Western Union Financial Services, Inc. (Western Union) to retain the money not collected by members of the class, contending that by Texas law the funds unclaimed by Texas citizens must be held in the custody of the State. The court rejected that contention and only the State appeals. We hold that the State has no standing and dismiss.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. HaysSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Melton v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re Oil Spill by the Oil Rig "Deepwater Horizon"District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2012
- In Re Lease Oil Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Wilson v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
- Sanchez v. TX BrineCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
- Poynor v. Chesapeake Exploration Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009