Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Hughes

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 21, 1990No. A90A0144PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Beasley, Judge.

Plaintiff Anderson appeals the grant of summary judgment to defendants Hughes, individually and d/b/a Saf-Ez Archery Products, Inc., in this product liability action. It alleged negligence, breach of implied warranty, and strict liability in the manufacture of a climbing/safety belt. Anderson maintained that he was using the device while climbing a tree when the stitching holding the tree strap to the safety belt broke, causing him to fall and sustain injury.

Defendants moved for summary judgment on the grounds that (1) plaintiff’s claims were time-barred because of late…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bible v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  2. Bible v. BibleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
  3. Webb v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  4. Adams v. GluckmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  5. Bowman v. United States Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. James Giles v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  2. Baughan v. AlaouiCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  3. Hester v. HumanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  4. Flemister v. HopkoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  5. Lee v. KimCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API