Legal Opinion
John W. Sellner v. Harry Solloway and Michael Goodman
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided May 22, 1959No. Patent Appeal 6437PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WORLEY, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Patent Interferences of the United States Patent Office awarding priority of invention of the subject matter of count 1 of Interference No. 88,049 to the junior party, Solloway and Goodman.
The invention is a combination chair and exerciser comprising a body-supporting frame of seat and back portions pivotally connected with means for sup porting the frame comprising two generally U-shaped members located at each side of said frame, with the upper ends of the legs of the members pivotally connected to the seat and back…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mason v. HepburnCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1898
- Hedenskoog v. BackusCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
- Sloan v. PetersonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
3Cited by4 opinions
- Richard C. Price v. Dale R. SymsekCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- F. Brantley Scott and John H. Burton v. Roy P. FinneyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- John O. Paivinen v. Eugene A. SandsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- John O. Paivinen v. Eugene A. SandsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968